about Johnny Depp could lose defamation case even when Amber Heard flops on the stand, authorized specialists say will cowl the most recent and most present steerage all however the world. method in slowly consequently you perceive skillfully and appropriately. will deposit your information cleverly and reliably
NEWNow you can take heed to Fox Information articles!
Actress Amber Heard’s “efficiency” on the stand final week — that is what Johnny Depp’s authorized crew has referred to as it — has been broadly panned. However that will not be sufficient to offer her ex-husband Depp a victory in his defamation case in opposition to her, specialists advised Fox Information Digital.
Trial advisor and physique language professional Susan Constantine analyzed Heard’s flip within the witness field and gave her a thumbs down for believability.
“She will not be truthful and most of what she’s saying is a lie,” Constantine mentioned in her estimation.
“That is such unhealthy appearing, I don’t know the way she’s going to get a film position after this.”
“That is such unhealthy appearing, I do not know the way she’s going to get a film position after this,” mentioned trial advisor and physique language professional Susan Constantine
Depp, 58, is suing Heard, 36, for $50 million over a 2018 op-ed she wrote within the Washington Put up figuring out herself as “a public determine representing home abuse.”
Though the piece didn’t reference Depp by identify, he claims it destroyed his profession and turned him right into a Hollywood pariah.
JOHNNY DEPP V. AMBER HEARD DEFAMATION TRIAL: LIVE UPDATES
Heard is countersuing for $100 million, accusing Depp and his former lawyer of conspiring to defame her by calling her abuse allegations a “hoax.”
Heard spent two days on the stand final week chronicling Depp’s alleged acts of verbal, bodily and sexual abuse that she says left her with a damaged nostril, black eyes and bruises.
In agonizing element, Heard described how Depp allegedly raped her with a bottle of Maker’s Mark in a drug-fueled rage on a visit to Australia in March 2015.
However many critics have referred to as out her tearless sobbing and melodramatic tone as inauthentic.
Heard’s facial expressions and physique actions are incongruent and so exaggerated as to be “off the scales,” Constantine mentioned. She added that the “Aquaman” star recounts too many extraneous particulars that trauma victims usually wouldn’t keep in mind — particularly six or extra years after the actual fact.
JOHNNY DEPP V. AMBER HEARD: THE SHOCKING TRIAL’S WILDEST MOMENTS
“Liars offer you an excessive amount of data,” she mentioned.
However that doesn’t imply that every part Heard has mentioned isn’t true, Constantine famous.
“I feel that when she described the headbutt, she was being truthful,” she mentioned, referring to Heard’s allegation that Depp launched his head into her and choked her unconscious throughout an 2015 argument at their penthouse.
“I do assume he was verbally degrading at occasions,” she added.
First Modification lawyer George Freeman, director of the Media Regulation Useful resource Heart, mentioned that Depp has a steep hill to climb to win the case. The “Black Mass” actor has to show not solely that Heard’s statements are false however that she knew they have been false when she made them, Freeman mentioned.
“When a public determine sues, it is way more troublesome to win,” mentioned First Modification lawyer George Freeman
He additionally has to persuade the jury that her accusations really broken his status.
“When a public determine sues, it is way more troublesome to win,” Freeman defined. “He has to show what was occurring inside her head, that she knew she was mendacity.”
A non-public particular person solely has to show negligence or carelessness to prevail in a defamation case.
Heard’s lawyer, Ben Rottenborn, has argued that Depp additionally has to show that Heard was really referring to him within the op-ed. If he does, the jury solely has to seek out that Depp verbally abused Heard as soon as for him to lose his defamation case, the legal professional has mentioned.
However civil and matrimonial lawyer Marilyn Chinitz disagreed, countering that the op-ed clearly referenced Depp and a home violence declare Heard publicly made in opposition to him two years prior.
The “London Fields” star, with bruises on her face and paparazzi in tow, went to a Los Angeles courthouse to acquire a restraining order in opposition to Depp in Might 2016, accusing him of bashing her within the eye with a cellphone.
“It’s a transparent line of claiming that Depp abused her bodily even when she didn’t use his identify,” she mentioned.
Chinitz added that the case will come right down to the cross-examination of Heard and whether or not Depp’s authorized crew can undermine her to the purpose that the jury received’t credit score any a part of her testimony.
The trial in Fairfax County Circuit Court docket in Virginia went darkish this week for a pre-scheduled break however will resume Monday with Heard again on the witness stand. After her testimony wraps, her attorneys plan to name Depp again to the stand in addition to his ex-girlfriend, Ellen Barkin, and Amber’s sister, Whitney Heard, however not essentially in that order, in response to a supply near her crew.
Each side have accused one another of bodily and verbal abuse and offered witnesses, audio recordings and images which have bolstered their respective claims.
Depp, who has referred to as Heard the abuser of their relationship, testified that she hurled a vodka bottle at him, severing the tip of his finger throughout an notorious Australia blowup in 2015.
“I feel they’ve each broken themselves on this lawsuit,” mentioned Chinitz, who represented Tom Cruise and Michael Douglas of their respective divorces. “You don’t get a positive feeling about both of them.”
Heard’s countersuit, alleging that Depp defamed her by calling her abuse declare a hoax, suffers from related obstacles, mentioned legal and civil legal professional Mark Bederow.
CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP
Heard’s crew should show that Depp, not his lawyer, was really behind the disparaging remark.
“However even when one celebration prevails, it is going to be a pyrrhic victory,” Bederow advised Fox Information Digital. “Each of their reputations have been severely broken on the general public stage.”
I want the article kind of Johnny Depp could lose defamation case even when Amber Heard flops on the stand, authorized specialists say provides perception to you and is helpful for toting as much as your information